Venue: David Hicks 1 - Civic Offices, Shute End, Wokingham RG40 1BN
Contact: Luciane Bowker Democratic & Electoral Services Specialist
To receive any apologies for absence.
Apologies for absence were submitted from Councillors Kate Haines and Graham Howe.
To confirm the Minutes of the Meeting held on 20 November 2019.
The Minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 20 November 2018 were confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.
Declaration of Interest
To receive any declarations of interest.
There were no declarations of interest.
Public Question Time
To answer any public questions.
A period of 30 minutes will be allowed for members of the public to ask questions submitted under notice.
The Council welcomes questions from members of the public about the work of this Committee.
Subject to meeting certain timescales, questions can relate to general issues concerned with the work of the Committee or an item which is on the Agenda for this meeting. For full details of the procedure for submitting questions please contact the Democratic Services Section on the numbers given below or go to www.wokingham.gov.uk/publicquestions
There were no public questions.
Member Question Time
To answer any Member questions.
There were no Member questions.
To consider a report on the latest Children’s Services Key Peformance Indicators.
The Committee considered the Children’s Services Performance Indicators report which was set out in agenda pages 15-26. Nick Hammond, Research and Information Officer presented the report.
The red indicators were discussed in more detail as follows:
1. EA1i: Percentage of Wokingham Borough State-Funded Primary Schools with a current Ofsted Rating of Good or Better
Nick Hammond stated that this indicator was red as a result of two primary schools having been judged as ‘Requires Improvement’ and one school as ‘Inadequate’. He informed that all these three schools had been previously rated as ‘Good’, these schools were on the Local Authority risk register and had been identified as vulnerable to the judgements received, one of the schools had been issued with a warning notice.
Nick Hammond stated that when schools were rated ‘Inadequate’ they were automatically subject to an academy order and the Governing Board was removed to be replaced by a School Improvement Board.
Nick Hammond stated that the Local Authority continued to work with the schools through the school improvement team to bring about positive change to these schools.
2. EA2: Percentage of children who attend a Wokingham State-Funded School (Primary, Secondary or Special) which is ‘Good’ or better
Nick Hammond stated that the reason for the decline in this indicator was the recent Ofsted ratings of ‘Requires Improvement’ and ‘Inadequate’, as explained above.
3. EA11: 12-Month Rolling Voluntary Turnover of Qualified Social Workers within Children’s Social Care and Early Intervention Service
Nick Hammond stated that this was a new measure which had been introduced for monitoring during 2018/19. Turnover was an indicator of the staff morale. The proposed targets assigned to this measure (green if less than 16%) suggested it was currently red. The service was monitoring this new measure and would provide a further update in the next performance report.
4. VP4: Percentage of referrals in 2018/19 which are repeat referrals within 12 months of the previous referral to Children’s Social Care
Nick Hammond believed this indicator was red as a result of an expected increase in referrals just before the summer holidays. The target of 20% or less was met for the other two months in the quarter, August and September.
5. VP7: Percentage of children leaving care who achieved permanence (adopted, returned home or special guardianship order is granted)
Nick Hammond stated that in Q2 four of the ten children leaving care achieved permanence. The other six children left care at the age of 18, three moving into independent living, one staying put with their foster carer and two remaining in residential care due to health needs. Those who leave care at the age of 18 will have a transition plan in place.
6. VP8: Percentage of child protection visits due in the period which were completed on time (within 10 days of the previous visit)
Nick Hammond stated that this was a local target. The drop in performance coincided with increased workloads and the main impact of this was that social workers were not ... view the full minutes text for item 37.
To consider the Quality Assurance Framework and the Annual Quality Assurance Report.
Jim Leivers, Interim Assistant Director for Children’s Social Care presented the Quality Assurance Framework/Annual Quality Assurance report which was set out on Agenda pages 27-38.
Jim Leivers stated that due to the various changes in the senior leadership structure in the past year, this report was omitted from the Committee’s work programme. It was now being presented to the Committee for the purpose of historical correctness and to enable the Committee to compare current and future performance with that of previous years. He stated that another report would be presented to the Committee around April time.
Jim Leivers stated that the Quality Assurance was critical monitor the performance of children’s social care, to access the quality of the work being undertaken to safeguard children.
Jim Leivers stated that Officers were looking at examples of best practice in other local authorities on how best to obtain information.
Jim Leivers tabled a copy of Appendix 1 of the report.
During the discussion of the item the following comments were made:
· In response to a question Jim Leivers stated that the audit exercise was spread across the service, he explained that the three outstanding cases did not relate to the same social worker;
· Carol Cammiss stated that it was known to the management team which social workers needed more help and support, and this was not necessarily linked to caseload, it could be due to inexperience;
· Members were interested to know how up to date the information was. Carol Cammiss stated the weekly reports with indicators were sent to all managers in all teams, issues were identified immediately. However, she pointed out that the increase in demand for services had impacted in the timeliness of recording;
· Carol Cammiss stated that the service had identified its priorities and that work was being undertaken to improve where necessary;
· Carol Cammiss stated that performance managers knew when things did not look good and would interrogate accordingly.
Councillor Helliar-Symons stated that social workers would be equipped with tablets to facilitate their admin work. She also stated that social worker recruitment was particularly difficult in this area, a Social Worker Task and Finish Group was currently looking to find possible solutions to this challenge. Some of the ideas to improve social worker recruitment were:
· Conversations were taking place to find a way to facilitate car parking for social workers
· Discussions were being held about offering housing for key workers
· Oxford Brook University would be encouraging social workers to stay in Wokingham
· A recruitment agency had been engaged
· It was hoped that by increasing the number of social workers the caseloads would be reduced, therefore making Wokingham more attractive to social workers
The Chairman pointed out that it was not always easy to move social workers’ caseloads due to the fact that it was important to cultivate stable relationships between families and social workers.
RESOLVED That the report be noted and that future Quality Assurance reports will be submitted to the Committee.
To consider an update on the Innovations Programme.
The Committee received a presentation by Jannie Goussard, Team Manager Brambles Social Care Team on the Innovations Programme.
Some of the points made by Jannie Goussard are highlighted below:
· This programme first started in Australia by Andrew Turnell and Steve Edwards, they really struggled with the concept of how to build a good working relationship with families and at the same time to be rigorous about safeguarding;
· One of the differences between this programme and others was that this programme was developed by practitioners;
· One of the core elements of the programme was to be able to get the family to understand what the local authority’s concerns were for the safety of the children;
· It was important to break down the language to basic levels so that families could understand, and that children could understand in order to contribute to their own safety;
· Another element of the programme was to create a balance between the professional judgement and the family’s understanding of the situation;
· When developing a plan it was important to look not only at the problems, but to consider the strengths and build a plan with the family, so that this plan could work for the family;
· It was important to look at the network around the children and the family, and to support not just one individual, but the whole network of families and friends (like a lightening system);
· The Signs of Safety Practice Principles were aligned with the Council’s own priorities and values;
· One of the principals was to respect everyone who we work with as individuals (we do not agree with the abuse but still work with the person);
· One of the principals was to help families understand that they have strengths and are capable of changes;
· It was important to understand what motivates families to help them move forward;
· It was important to treat every engagement as an opportunity for growth. Most assessments models follow a sequence where there is an assessment, followed by a plan and then intervention. With the Signs of Safety Practice the intervention starts at the first point of contact, and every contact with the family incorporates intervention, which runs alongside assessment;
· It is a statutory duty of local authorities to use a recognised evidence based practice framework;
· The Sign of Safety model was a recognised programme, and was now adopted by approximately 50 Councils in England and 17 countries;
· Research showed that with Signs of Safety families felt more empowered and more able to understand the concerns and what needed to change;
· One of the concerns of Signs of Safety was that only the right children came into care, and as far as possible families and wider networks were supported to keep the children in their care;
· Practitioners that worked with the programme felt more job satisfaction;
· Wokingham was now in the second phase of implementation of the Innovations Programme;
· 44% of staff had had advanced training in the programme, 41% had had the basic training and 15% ... view the full minutes text for item 39.
To consider the Council’s SEND Strategy.
The Committee received the Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Strategy report which was set out in Agenda pages 55-70.
Paul Doherty, Assistant Director for Education stated that the service would like to consult with partners in regards to the proposed SEND Strategy. He was seeking the Committee’s endorsement to go out to consultation, and stated that the result of the consultation would be brought back to the Committee for consideration. T
Paul Doherty stated that the strategy would bring existing policies and priorities up to date and it included forward planning for the next three years.
Paul Doherty stated that Wokingham schools were good, with achievements above the national targets. However, there was a growth in the demand for places for SEND children and young people, in particular children and young people with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Social, Emotional and Mental Health (SEMH) needs, this growth was in line with the national picture.
Paul Doherty stated that one in 40 children in Wokingham had an Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP), meaning that they had a statutory need of special education. There was also a large number of children (2,799) who were categorised as needing Special Educational Needs (SEN) support. It was anticipated that an additional 125 SEND places would be required by 2023. Currently the Council educated 60% of children and young people requiring special education within the Borough. However, 133 were educated outside of Wokingham, with half of those in expensive independent or non-maintained special schools.
Paul Doherty stated that there was a current overspend in the High Needs Block (HNB) funding of 2.8 million. Most local authorities were facing an overspend in the HNB. This strategy was one way to address this overspend.
Paul Doherty highlighted the five principles listed in the strategy which were:
· Encouraging independence
· Communicating well
· Working in partnership
· Identifying need early
· Ensuring financial sustainability
Paul Doherty stated that the strategy included the expansion of Addington School, which was due to go through the formal Executive approval and the planning application process.
Paul Doherty stated that the cost of supporting all the children and young people in Wokingham with SEND was 18 million. With increased demand it was import to develop a strategy to deal with the demand. He informed that a Strategic Board had been formed to develop the strategy.
During the discussion of the item the following points were made:
· Councillor Bray pointed out that on page 65 there was mention of SEND children aged 5-16, she believed that SEND was up to 18 years of age. Paul Doherty stated that most EHCPs were up to 18, but could go up to 25, however it was not statutory after 18;
· Councillor Bray asked that the wording be modified to make it clearer that there was provision after 16;
· Councillor Bray was concerned with the language used in the bottom of page 68 of the Agenda, where it said that ‘…these will all be investigated as part of this strategy.’ She ... view the full minutes text for item 40.
To consider a report setting out details of school performance and the most recent Ofsted inspection reports.
The Committee considered the Schools Performance Indicators and Ofsted Reports paper which was set out in Agenda pages 71-77.
Paul Doherty informed that since the last meeting of the Committee there had been two Ofsted inspection, one was rated ‘Good’ and the other was rated ‘Inadequate’ and was now in special measures.
Paul Doherty pointed out that Northern House (special school), which had been rated ‘Inadequate’ by Ofsted was an academy and therefore not the responsibility of the local authority. The Regional Schools Commissioner, on behalf of the DfE was accountable for state funded academy schools.
Paul Doherty stated that he had visited the Northern House School and had had a conversation with the Headteacher, the local authority was engaged with the school. He believed that the children’s behaviour was improved from what he had seen during his visit.
Paul Doherty went through the provisional outcomes at KS2 during the summer of 2018, as described in the report. He pointed out that Wokingham scored higher than the national average in all measurements, however the aspiration was to improve even more.
Paul Doherty stated that based on the English Baccalaureate average point score (shown on page 76 of the Agenda) every child in Wokingham achieved one grade higher than the national average.
RESOLVED That the report be noted.
To consider the Committee’s Forward Programme.
The Committee considered the Forward Plan and no changes were made.
Councillor Bray advised that as she would be unable to attend the February meeting Councillor David Hare would substitute her.
Members expressed concern over the low level of attendance at meetings.
The Chairman pointed out that the Regional Schools Commissioner was due to attend the next meeting and urged Members and Officer to think of relevant questions to ask him ahead of the meeting.
Exclusion of the Public
That under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting for the following items of business on the grounds that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Act (as amended) as appropriate.
That under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting for the following items of business on the grounds that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 3 of the Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Act as appropriate.
Schools causing concern - Part 2
A report indicating schools that are causing concern and the actions being taken will be considered in Part 2 session.
The report was discussed in a part 2 session.