Venue: Civic Offices, Shute End, Wokingham, RG40 1BN
Contact: Luciane Bowker Senior Democratic Services Officer
To receive any apologies for absence.
There were no apologies for absence received.
To confirm the Minutes of the Meeting held on 17 January 2017.
The Minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 17 January 2017 were confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman, subject to the following corrections:
Alison Swaddle’s statement regarding Governors training on page 9 should read:
‘…the support through the Headteacher recruitment process offered by Children’s Services was very good.
Correction of typing error on page 11, where it said ‘careers faires’ it should say ‘careers fairs’.
Not all Members of the Committee had received a list of governors’ vacancies. Judith Ramsden, Director of People Services agreed to circulate a list of governors’ vacancies to all elected Members.
Declaration of Interest
To receive any declarations of interest.
Councillor Rowland declared a personal interest in Agenda item 61, Schools Causing Concern, on the basis that her daughter is a teacher at Emmbrook Secondary School, her granddaughter is attends Lambs Lane Primary School and she is a governor at Highwood Primary School. Councillor Rowland remained in the meeting during discussions but did not vote in the matter.
Councillor Soane declared a personal interest in Agenda Item 58, Coombes School Task and Finish Group and Agenda item 61, Schools Causing Concern on the basis that his daughter is a teaching assistant at the Coombes CE Primary School and also his grandson attends the same school. Councillor Soane remained in the meeting during discussions but did not vote in the matter.
Public Question Time
To answer any public questions.
A period of 30 minutes will be allowed for members of the public to ask questions submitted under notice.
The Council welcomes questions from members of the public about the work of this committee.
Subject to meeting certain timescales, questions can relate to general issues concerned with the work of the Committee or an item which is on the Agenda for this meeting. For full details of the procedure for submitting questions please contact the Democratic Services Section on the numbers given below or go to www.wokingham.gov.uk/publicquestions
There were no public questions.
Member Question Time
To answer any member questions.
There were no Member questions.
To receive and consider a report giving details of the Signs of Safety practice framework.
The Committee received the Innovations Programme report which was set out in agenda pages 15-22. The Chairman praised the report and invited Members to comment.
During the discussion of the item Lisa Humphreys, Head of Social Care and Intervention clarified points raised by Members:
· Councillor Rowland asked what MTM stood for; Lisa informed that this related to Munro, Turnell and Murphy;
· Councillor Blumenthal asked when MOSAIC would be implemented. Lisa stated that there was ongoing work developing this with IT, she believed it would be fully implemented by September this year;
· Lisa clarified that MOSAIC was an upgrade from framework and not a completely new system;
· Councillor Younis would like to have the opportunity to scrutinise this system before it went live;
· Judith explained that the system was being tested, and that professional Social Workers would influence its development;
· The Chairman asked if other Members were interested in scrutinising the system before it went live. Councillor Blumenthal expressed an interest;
· Judith offered to share the Social Workers’ survey with the Committee, as that would demonstrate the effectiveness of the system based in real practice;
· The Chairman suggested that Councillors Blumenthal and Younis contact Councillor Pauline Jorgensen in order to obtain more information through the IT Task and Finish Group led by her;
· Judith explained that this was still subject to approval by the DFE. This was a collaborative piece of work, Wokingham was part of a group of 10 Local Authorities that were seeking to implement it;
· In response to a question, Judith stated that Wokingham was likely to be approved for this initiative because of the following factors: the Chief Executive’s reputation; being small Local Authority and having strong senior leadership support;
· The Chairman asked for future updates on this programme, Judith suggested bringing an update report in April 2018;
· Councillor Younis asked what performance measures would be used. Lisa stated that this would be monitored in three levels: by the DFE; by the consultants rolling it out and by the service’s own measurements.
1) The Committee endorses the implementation of the Signs of Safety Practice Framework and supports the next steps identified in the report;
2) An update report outlining how the programme continues to make a difference will be brought to the Committee in 2018.
To receive and consider a report giving details of the education being received by children not at school.
During the meeting it was noted that Alan Stubbersfield was leaving the Council as his contract was ending. The Chairman expressed sincere gratitude for all his work and his contribution to the education in the Borough, and wished him well in the future.
The Committee considered the Elective Home Education report which was set out in agenda pages 23-28. During the discussion of the item the following comments were made:
· Councillor Soane expressed concern as to how children being educated at home would develop social skills;
· Alan explained that the Local Authority’s powers in relation to children being educated at home were limited. Alan stated that some families arranged for offsite activities and used facilities in the community for learning;
· Alan informed that there was a new Officer working with monitoring Elective Home Education. This Officer was a teacher, therefore well equipped to supervise the level of education being achieved at home;
· It was noted that home educated children should learn in all dimensions, social and academic development were both monitored;
· Councillor Soane shared an example (not in Wokingham Borough) were a family had decided to home educate their child because the child was being bullied at school and the school had not dealt with the bullying;
· In response to a question Alan confirmed that if a child had never been registered at a school, there was no way of knowing and monitoring this child’s education;
· Councillor Swaddle stated that a resident in her ward had not been able to obtain a suitable place at a local school and as a result was considering home education;
· Councillor Dolinski was interested to know the reasons for parents choosing to home educate, and also any trends;
· Alan stated that the reasons were not always known. Some of the reasons included: parents not wanting a special school for children with SEN; bullying and no accessible school offer;
· Councillor Dolinski observed that more children were taken out of school to be home educated in transitional points, for example in Year 6. He asked if schools were being pro-active in addressing this trend. Alan stated that this related to a very small number of children, schools monitored vulnerable children very closely. Alan also stated that the trend was not linked to an area, but to groups of people, for example the Gipsy Roma Traveller (GRT) community had a large percentage of children not in school;
· Councillor Blumenthal asked for information regarding the grades of home educated children. Alan stated that there was no data available, historically this related to a very small number of children. However, this information could be collated for future analysis;
· Members were concerned about the limited powers of the Local Authority in relation to the education of children not at school;
· Judith stated that the current legislative framework caused much debate and challenges amongst professionals;
· Judith stated that most parents acted with their child’s best interests at heart. Cases of abuse were rare;
· Councillor Soane believed the Local Authority should be ... view the full minutes text for item 57.
To receive a report containing the latest Ofsted report results and outlining school improvement practices.
The Committee received the schools’ performance and Ofsted school reports which was set out in agenda pages 29-36.
The Committee noted that four schools had been inspected since the last meeting as listed below.
Southfield Special School
The school was closed at the end of December 2016. It was now part of Northern House as part of a multi-academy trust and has no formal designation (NFD) until it gets inspected in its third year of operation.
Lambs Lane Primary School
The school was inspected on 11-12 January 2017 and the outcome was a move from ‘Requiring Improvement’ to ‘Good’. Alan stated that the school had effective governors and attendance was improving.
Willow Bank Infant School
The school was inspected on 9 February 2017 and the outcome was that the school continued ‘Good’. Alan pointed out that the Headteacher had been in the school for less than a year, so this was an excellent result.
Hatch Ride Primary School
The school was inspected on 28 February 2017 and the Ofsted report had not yet been published.
Alan stated that over the last three months there had been various communications with Ofsted and The Regional Schools Commissioner (RSC). The Regional Director’s initial contact in the autumn related concerns about Wokingham’s disadvantaged children at key stage 1 in phonics and reading. The actions to address the challenges were outlined; these were predominantly around sharing information, awareness raising, support, strategies, challenge, professional development, training and research. The collaborative work with the region was positive.
Alan stated that although the number of disadvantaged children in Wokingham was small, it was important to undertake the necessary work to close the gap.
In response to a question Alan stated that Wellington College worked collaboratively with Wokingham schools, mainly with secondary schools.
RESOLVED That the report be noted.
To receive and consider the proposed action plan following the Coombes School Task and Finish Group.
The Committee considered the Coombes School Task and Finish Group Action Plan report which was set out in agenda pages 37-42. Councillor Younis informed that a final meeting had taken place and an action plan had been discussed with senior Officers.
Councillor Younis stated that a number of the recommendations listed in the final report had already been implemented; therefore the action plan presented a reduced number of recommendations.
Councillor Rowland pointed out that in page 38 where Woodley School was mentioned, it should state Woodley CE Primary School.
Alan announced that a partnership between Earley St Peters CE Primary and Coombes CE Primary had been approved. The schools would form a trust.
Councillor Dolinski stated that the Coombes School Task and Finish Group was a good example of cross political party work.
The Chairman thanked all Members that took part in the Task and Finish Group.
The Committee agreed that the actions proposed in the report would be included in the forward programme for monitoring.
RESOLVED That the Committee acknowledges what has already been done, accepts the report and agree to the action plan.
To receive and consider a report giving details of the Children’s Services key performance indicators.
The Committee received the Children’s Services Performance Indicators report which was set out in agenda pages 43-55.
The Committee noted that there were no changes from the previous report presented to the last meeting and were content with the explanations given to red and amber indicators.
The Chairman asked that an indicator relating to ‘children getting into trouble’ /‘re-offenders’ be included in the report for future monitoring.
RESOLVED That the Children’s Services performance indicators be noted.
To consider the forward programme for the Committee for the remainder of the municipal year.
The Committee considered the forward plan which was set out in agenda pages 55-62.
The Committee considered the list of possible items and the following items were included to the next meeting’s agenda:
· Children and Young People Plan – refresh
· Early Years Strategy
The Chairman asked that when the Secondary School place planning report is produced, that this include information regarding places for children living in the Wokingham Without ward. She advised Officers to liaise with Bracknell Council about this.
Judith proposed to discuss the list of possible items with Officers in Children’s Services and agree the timings of reports accordingly. She would work with Luciane Bowker, Senior Democratic Services Officer to update the forward plan. Once this was completed, Judith suggested circulating it via email to Members of the Committee.
1) The report be noted and
2) The updated forward plan will be circulated to Members once completed.
Early Education and Childcare Sufficiency
The Committee received the Early Education and Childcare Sufficiency presentation by Paul Feven, Interim Head of Strategic Commissioning.
Paul went through the slides and the main points made by him are listed below:
· From September 2017 working parents would be entitled to an additional 15 hours of free childcare per week for 2 to 4 year olds;
· There were ongoing discussions about the duty of Local Authorities in relation to this entitlement;
· The additional hours did not have to be delivered in term time only;
· It was important to make the local market attractive to providers;
· The National Funding Formula determined a £4.15 per hour rate per child;
· The Local Authority had no formal power to direct providers to offer the additional hours;
· The Local Authority could not increase funding over the national allocation;
· Most parents in Wokingham were satisfied with the local provision but would like more flexible childcare, for example outside of 9am-5pm and holiday childcare;
· There had been briefings and individualised support for providers through visits and surgeries.
· The provision of flexible childcare was being explored with providers;
· The Local Authority was successful in obtaining capital funding for new provisions. There were three successful bids for 94 places;
· There was continued involvement in national and regional networks;
There was a robust discussion of the item and during discussion the following points were made:
· Councillor Blumenthal pointed out that there was a gap between the market rate of £5 per hour and the funded rate of £4.15 per hour. She was concerned about the implication of this gap;
· Councillor Miall was disappointed that a report had not been submitted prior to the meeting with the agenda. Judith stated that this was not the strategy, but just an initial ‘heads up’ on the initial arrangements for the provision;
· Councillor Miall expressed concern that providers would not be able to deliver the additional 15 hours free childcare a week. He stated that he had had conversations with providers who mentioned they would not be able to offer the additional hours;
· Judith stated the service was looking into ways to promote the market to respond to the challenge, the Local Authority was not a direct provider;
· The Chairman raised the following concerns:
o Are local providers happy with £4.15 per hour? Is this enough to subsidise the offer?
o Have we done an honest survey?
· Paul Feven confirmed that one survey had already been undertaken, and there would be another;
· In response to a question Alan stated the providers had the liberty to decide to continue offering 15 hours a week, to increase the hours or stop altogether;
· Judith confirmed that the provision was market driven, a further survey would hopefully reveal providers intentions;
· Members would like a report containing the strategy to be submitted to the Committee, including providers’ names. Judith stated that this information may be sensitive;
· The Chairman pointed out that Crowthorne, which was listed as one of the places for planned expansion, was not in Wokingham ... view the full minutes text for item 62.
Exclusion of the Public
That under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting for the following items of business on the grounds that they involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Act as appropriate.
Schools Causing Concern
A report outlining schools causing concern will be considered in a part 2 session.
This item was considered and discussed in a part 2 session.
RESOLVED That the contents of the report be noted.